Bigfoot Encounters

By Michael Seres, Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center
Alleged and true discoveries of large primates in South America

Ameranthropoides loysi, or Mono Rei:

Between 1917-1920, a Swiss geologist, named Dr. Francois de Loys and his men were searching for oil around the River Tarra and Rio Catatumbo at the Venezuelan - Colombian border in South America (Heuvelmans, 1959). This mountainous region, the Sierra de Perijaa, was heavily forested, and that time was inhabited by the 'dangerous' Motilone Indians.

One day, while de Loys and his crew were resting near the Tarra river deep in the jungle, two tall monkeys suddenly stepped out of the woods, screaming and shaking branches. They were holding onto bushes, walked upright, then broke off several branches, waving them like weapons. When the monkeys threw their own excrement at the terrified de Loys and his exhausted companions, they grabbed their guns and fired at the more aggressive-looking male, but killed the female. The male stepped aside, though wounded, but disappeared in the forest.

Since de Loys, and his people have never seen such large monkeys, he wanted to preserve the carcass. When finally de Loys returned home with the only remaining evidence, the picture, which he had placed into his travel-notebook, he basically forgot about his encounter with the unknown monkeys. Years later his friend, French anthropologist Georges Montandon flipped the pages of de Loys' notebook, and discovered the photo. Montandon got an idea.

Although Professor Montandon was familiar with most of the monkeys discovered to that date, he had never seen one like that in de Loys' picture. Montandon speculated, that the large monkey on the picture was a very human-like creature. It had no tail. Its size according to de Loys was 4 feet 5 inches. It had 32 teeth. It had all the features like the anthropoids in the Old World have and, therefore must be an anthropoid Ape. Not just any Ape, but an 'American' Ape -- a 'Missing Link!' He asked de Loys for more details, calculated some measurements by estimating and comparing the size of the box with the body on the picture, and in 1929, convinced de Loys to tell the story to the Illustrated London News (Loys, 1929 op. cit.: Keith, 1929; Heuvelmans, 1959; Hill, 1962) Shortly therafter, Montandon published his statement in the Journal de la Societe des Americanistes (Montandon, 1929a); then wrote another note which he presented at the French Academy of Sciences in Paris. (Montandon, 1929b). 'Montandon went so far as to create a new genus Amer-anthropoides for the reception of the new animal, giving it the specific name loysi in honour of its discoverer.' (Hill, 1962).

At the meeting of The French Academy of Sciences Montadon tried to present some convincing 'evidence' about his major discovery of the American Ape, a so far unknown 'American version' of the African chimpanzee and gorilla, and the Asian orangutan. He and de Loys, - who under Montandon's pressure also tried to support the new discovery hypothesis, - had to face with numerous questions at the Academy.

Naturalists and anthropologists questioned them very suspiciously. They raised many questions about the photograph: the size of the monkey sitting on the box, about her 'missing' tail, her set of only 32 teeth, her spider-monkey-like face (Joleaud, 1929), her female sex organ - that resembled that of a male spider monkey. (Female spider monkeys have a long, bulbous clitoris, that people, even today often mistaken for the male sex organ).

The skepticism and some of the criticisms resulted in heated debates, often ridiculing Montandon's alleged hypothesis as a fraud (Keith, 1929 op. cit.; Heuvelmans, 1959). When Montandon ran out of more convincing arguments in order to support his fancy hypothesis, he tried to bring up some anecdotes based on stories of Indian tribes like about the guayazi, the di-di, and the vasitri or 'big-devil' that believed to attack women. These stories were similar in nature, to those, that people were attributing to gorillas in Africa (Heuvelmans, 1959). A. de Humboldt, who did not believe any of these stories, attributed these alleged attacks to the spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus) and Marquis de Wavrin mentions these creatures as 'marimunda' which were later also identified as spider monkeys: Ateles belzebuth (Wendt, 1956; Heuvelmans, 1959; Hill, 1962).

Montandon was defeated in scientific circles, but the story created some ambiguity, which led into more investigations for years to come, and in the mind of some, even today, that there are still some large, yet mysterious creatures of several kind, like Bigfoot, Yeti, Chupakabra, and Snowman still roaming the wilderness.

Heuvelmans, B. (1959). ON THE TRACK OF UNKNOWN ANIMALS (Transl. from French by Richard Garnett) Hill and Wang, New York
Hill, W. C. O., (1962). PRIMATES Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy Vol. 5 Cebidae, Part B. Edinburgh University Press
Joleaud, L. (1929) 'Remarques sur l'Evolution des Primates Sud-Americains, a propos du Grand Singe du Venezuela' Rev. sci., Paris, pp. 269-273, 11 May 1929
Keith, Sir A. (1929) 'The Alleged Discovery of an Anthropoid Ape in South America' Man (London) 29: 135-136. Loys, F. de (1929) 'A Gap filled in the Pedigree of Man?' Illustrated London News, London, 15 June 1929, p. 1040
Montandon, G. (1929a) 'Decouverte d'un Singe d'Apparence Anthropoide en Amerique du Sud' J. Soc. Americanistes Paris, n.s. 21
Montandon, G. (1929b) 'Singe d'Apparence Anthropoide en Amerique du Sud' C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 11 March 1929
Wendt, H. (1956) NOE NYOMABAN Az allatok felfedezese - AUF NOAHS SPUREN Die Entdeckung der Tiere by G. Grote sche Verlagsbuchandlung, Hamm. (Westf.) [Transl. from German by Auer Kalman, 1972] Gondolat, Budapest, Hungary
- ---

Protopithecus brasiliensis Lund, 1838
Caipora bambuiorum Cartelle and Hartwig, 1996

'There is no smoke without fire' says the proverb. There really have been some larger primates in South America. The evidence consists of the fossil remains of two species of extinct giant primates in South America, which keeps paleo-primatologists and evolutionary primatologists extremely busy and excited today.

These fossil remains, however, other than the size of their bones indicating that they possibly belong to either a large howler (Alouatta), woolly (Brachyteles) or spider (Ateles) monkey (Hartwig and Cartelle, 1996; Cartelle and Hartwig, 1996) have nothing to do with the way these were discovered. In fact, they were found far from the region of Sierra de Perija, where Dr. de Loys originally encountered and then shot his spider monkey, more than 2800 miles southeast in the state of Bahia in Brazil.

A limestone cave system near the town of Lagoa Santa ('holy pond') about 20 miles north of Belo Horizonte ('beautiful horizon') (Simpson, 1984). This cave system has been a Mecca for anthropologists and paleontologists, where numerous mammal remains, such as ground-sloth, giant armadillo, bear, capybara and human remains have been found (Walter, 1948).

The Protopithecus brasiliensis remains (part of a femur and a humerus) were originally discovered by the Danish naturalist, Peter W. Lund in 1836 (Lund, 1836), but was largely misrepresented and ignored for more than 150 years (Hartwig, 1995). A complete skeleton of the same species has been found in another cave, Toca da Boa Vista near Campo Formosa in Bahia, Brazil in 1992. The remains indicate an animal of approximately 25 kg (about 50 pounds) mass of body size, which is twice the weight of the largest spider monkey live in South America today (Hartwig & Cartelle, 1996). The Caipora bambuiorum skeleton, which was also found in the same cave estimated to weight 20,5 kg (roughly 45 pounds) (Cartelle & Hartwig, 1996), but still considerably heavier than the biggest living spider monkey recorded so far (Peres, 1994).

These new findings indicate that these monkeys were substantially larger than their descendants today; certainly giants among the New World monkeys, but they fall far behind the mass weight of the chimpanzee, orangutan and gorilla, and they are not Apes.
- ---

Cartelle, C. & Hartwig, W.C. (1996) A new extinct primate among the Pleistocene megafauna of Bahia, Brazil. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:6405-6409.
Hartwig, W. C. (1995) A giant New World monkey from the Pleistocene of Brazil. J. of Human Evolution 28:189- 195
Hartwig, W. C. & Cartelle, C. (1996) A complete skeleton of the giant South American primate Protopithecus. Nature 381(6580):307-311.
Lund, P. W. (1838) Blik paa Braziliens dyreverden for sidste jordomvaeltning. Det Kong. Danske Viden. Selsk. Natur. Matem. Afhand. 8:61-144.
Peres, C. A. (1994) Which are the largest New World monkeys? J. of Human Evolution 26:245-249.
Simpson, G. G. (1984) DISCOVERERS OF THE LOST WORLD. New Haven: Yale University Press
- ---
Michael Seres
Page last modified: February 15, 2002

- ---

Back to Creatures?
Back to What's New?

Back to Newspaper & Magazine Articles?

Portions of this website are reprinted under the Fair Use Doctrine of International Copyright Law as educational material without benefit of financial gain. This proviso is applicable throughout the entire website at Bigfoot Encounters